16 March 2011, 09:09 AM
(This post was last modified: 16 March 2011, 09:13 AM by Samuel Lee.)
Hi everyone, I guess I will on-hold ALL BVE development with effect for now until the poll reaches an agreement to fix every tiny issue in the present BVESG.
What happen is if u notice, the gangway is 1.5m for each coupler side, and a coupler is the middle of 2 train cars which makes it 1.5m + 1.5m = 3m for the ENTIRE gangway!!!!! Isnt that too long?
Also, if you have noticed, the PSD glass also no standard one. Apart of the glass that joins into different cars, there is a sub standard of 5.3m, 5.35m and 5.45m between the doors. For the glass that joins into different cars (Where the gangway lies, every 4 doors got one such), it has a different variety of 6.65m, 6.7m and 6.75m.
With that in mind, can I appeal to all developers to come into a standard length and reduce the length of gangway to 0.5m per side, a sharp reduce of 1m to match the realistic length.
With that, I hope to extend the seats from present 35cm, 9 seats format (Unrefurb) to 43cm, 9 seats format that matches the wikipedia. Hence, I would be able to leave for space in the day where C651 has refurb to become 48cm, 7 seats format as per C151 refurb.
As for the new gangway length, if you suggest it is not 0.5m, a.k.a 50cm per side, you may feel free to suggest one
What happen is if u notice, the gangway is 1.5m for each coupler side, and a coupler is the middle of 2 train cars which makes it 1.5m + 1.5m = 3m for the ENTIRE gangway!!!!! Isnt that too long?
Also, if you have noticed, the PSD glass also no standard one. Apart of the glass that joins into different cars, there is a sub standard of 5.3m, 5.35m and 5.45m between the doors. For the glass that joins into different cars (Where the gangway lies, every 4 doors got one such), it has a different variety of 6.65m, 6.7m and 6.75m.
With that in mind, can I appeal to all developers to come into a standard length and reduce the length of gangway to 0.5m per side, a sharp reduce of 1m to match the realistic length.
With that, I hope to extend the seats from present 35cm, 9 seats format (Unrefurb) to 43cm, 9 seats format that matches the wikipedia. Hence, I would be able to leave for space in the day where C651 has refurb to become 48cm, 7 seats format as per C151 refurb.
As for the new gangway length, if you suggest it is not 0.5m, a.k.a 50cm per side, you may feel free to suggest one